Welcome! This is a website that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Seminar HomeThis is a featured page

Investigating Prospective Teachers as Learning Design Authors

This seminar reports on findings from a recent study situated in the area of pre-service teacher education. The project investigated prospective teachers authoring and using their own contextualised learning designs. Seventeen secondary and primary pre-service teachers adapted existing, well-researched learning strategies to inform the design of their own specific online learning tasks and how they implemented these tasks in the context of their teaching practicum. The prospective teachers used an online learning design authoring system as a tool and flexible ‘test-bed’ for their learning designs and implementation. An account of the ways in which the prospective teachers developed sophisticated understandings of their chosen learning strategy and developed fresh insights into online and face-to-face teaching issues is presented.

Keywords: professional learning, teacher education, learning designs, learning strategies, learning design authoring systems



MKSeminar Home - SeminarKirsty Young
matthew.kearney@uts.edu.auanne.prescott@uts.edu.aukirsty.young@uts.edu.au

Welcome Message ...



The Study



Background to Study (Slides 1 to 6):

Background to Study (Slides 7 to 12):

Findings A (Slides 13 to 17):


Findings B (Slides 18 to 28):


Conclusions (Slides 29 to 34):




...with special thanks to Rosemary McLellan for her assistance reading quotes.


Comments or Questions ...


Feel free to leave a comment, raise an issue or ask a question on the voicethread below (text, audio or video-based comments welcome!). Otherwise, proceed to the Discussion Threads (scroll to the very bottom of the screen - below "Related Papers") to leave a comment or post a reply.




Related Papers

1. Kearney, M., Prescott, A. & Young, K. (2008). Investigating prospective teachers as learning design authors. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho & B. Harper (Eds.). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies. IGI Publishing: USA. Pp264-282

2. Kearney, M. & Young, K. (2007, December). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of LAMS as a teaching tool. In Atkinson, R.J., McBeath, C., Soong, S. K. A. & Cheers, C. (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) 2007 (pp. 490-499). Singapore: Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University. Retrieved 7th May 2008 from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kearney.pdf

3. Kearney, M. & Young, K. (2007, December). An emerging learning design based on analogical reasoning. In L. Cameron & J. Dalziel (Eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International LAMS Conference 2007: Practical Benefits of Learning Design (pp 51-61). Sydney: LAMS Foundation. Retrieved 7th May 2008 from http://lamsfoundation.org/lams2007sydney/refereedpapers.htm (Access Podcast)

Resources

LAMS was the 'test-bed' used in this study by participants as a learning design authoring environment.
A short video-based introduction to LAMS can be found here.



mkearney
mkearney
Latest page update: made by mkearney , May 14 2008, 8:00 PM EDT (about this update About This Update mkearney Edited by mkearney

1 word added
1 word deleted

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
rphilip Blended learning 1 May 16 2008, 2:30 AM EDT by kirstyyoung
Thread started: May 15 2008, 8:50 PM EDT  Watch
Hi Matthew Kirsty and Anne,

I thought it was interesting in your project that the students were learning early in their careers about the strengths and weaknesses of the f2f vs the online environment and how the two contexts can best be combined – not seen as separate. This comes down to knowing the affordances of all the technologies they use, and their own personal strengths and weaknesses as a teacher. I think it would have been a really valuable learning situation, prompting much discussion and reflection. Well done.

Did students comment about their own predictions regarding time taken for students to complete tasks? I think we all underestimate how long tasks will take in a new learning situation, especially where e-learning is concerned, whether we are working with staff or students. Was there any feedback on this?
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Show Last Reply

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Showing 1 of 1 threads for this page